Keliso is a donation-based system where, once the creator is paid in full, the production is released to everyone; not just to the people that contributed, but everyone. This raises an obvious question: why donate? Why not wait for other people to donate first, or donate more? As someone asked within a forum debating recommendations for the new Canadian copyright laws, "How can one buyer PAY MORE, while another PAYS LESS, and yet they have the same 'product'?"
Excellent question. The
answer is that people aren't paying for digital content, they are paying
for something else, something tacked onto the content. People won't
pay for something they can get for free; after all, that's a pretty
silly thing to do. So, whenever people pay for what amounts to the
common good, they are actually paying for something else. This is what
I have no intention of "releasing" the mechanism behind Keliso,
not without being paid first, but I can show how several other existing
value-added systems work. Let's take a limited edition print for
example. The photographer signs and sells only 100 of them for a high
price but, to gain interest, basically gives the actual print away on
the net. Anyone can download the print and enjoy it for free, but if
they want something more, the exclusivity of the signed limited-edition
print, they have to pay for it. Take the limited-edition print and copy
it, and it's worth exactly what the free print is worth - nothing.
It's not about selling the print, the photographer is selling something
else... the "limited" part.
The iTunes Store is another
value-added system. Apple's not really selling the music, they're
selling a convenient hassle-free download service. Apple then just
tosses some money to the original artists so they can continue using the
content, to sell the service. People will pay a dollar for
ease-of-use, even if they can get the content elsewhere for free. This
is the reason iTunes works.
Neither of these
value-added mechanisms are how Keliso operates, but they are crude
analogies. On Keliso, the people donating money aren't really paying
for the content, they are paying for something else. Funding the
content is just a byproduct of the system. Keliso needs content to
operate; without content, Keliso is devoid of purpose. But, by tying
the unique nature of Keliso communities to the work of
content-producers, a lot of great things can happen. The communities
can be self-moderating, without the need for oversight, people can deal
with the inevitable troublemakers and trolls
by themselves. Communities can operate anonymously while still making
these anonymous accounts valuable, so that people will act responsibly
with them. It's the way human communities are suppose to work.
vibrant and healthy Keliso community will be a great place to be a part
of. It offers all of the standard forum-based activities, yet offers
mechanisms to deal with the troublemakers. And, as a byproduct of a
functioning community, productions get funded, artists earn a living,
and the creative commons, the sum-total of all freely-available content,
gains in value.
This is what Keliso has to offer.
What is Keliso?